Blog

  • A Solemn Wish Meets a Desperate Plea

    This is my first original prose piece posted on this blog. Please leave any and all feedback in the comments!!

    written by: morgan williams

    Deep in my heart, there lies a secret; a confession ensconced to the walls of my throat, trapped in by a wall of barbed wire that would sooner unmarry my head from my neck than form words on my tongue. A secret that drifts around as abstract shapes in my mind, too painful to mature into a thought. But, as the moon reaches its peak, the seal on my throat weakens, and the haze in my mind clears. Trembling hands grip the sword of cowardice, and step onto a lonely battlefield.

    A forsaken little soldier boy clad in loose linen sleepwear, with a sword as long as a whip, but as thin as a sheet of paper. If it weren’t my own image, I’d laugh too. On one side, there is fickle determination; on the other, endless resentment. What a depressing lineup. There are no colosseums of ghosts to cheer nor jeer at him. Not even a debauched crowd would find joy in gambling on his fate. No one bears witness to the final stand.

    Even I, watching from a distance, am not sure what to expect next-

    Thick trails of sweat and tears kiss as they accompany each other down his cheeks and drop heavily on his sword. The reflection of the boy in the sword ripples as it is drowned by the couple. The little soldier boy’s furrowed brow and pursed lips were traditionally always a harbinger of a tantrum, but on his face now, they rather resemble a theatre mask. If only the battlefield were a stage. If only the grass were replaced by lacquered wood, with bright spotlights and an enraptured audience. But what’s a mask to a soldier? What’s a little, unconvincing performance in a war?

    If it weren’t my own image, I think I would be more convinced. But when I look upon him, I can only notice the thin cracks and chipped paint on his second-hand mask of bravery. Young and credulous. Weak and brazen. Gazing at that little boy, I can only ask myself: what right do I have to those feelings anymore? The boy cruelly remains unmoved.

    It’s not like I revel in my own weakness — I despise it. But just as I am incapable of valor, I am incapable of change. However, ‘incapable’ doesn’t quite encapsulate the feeling. It is a little closer to fear. Fear that my cowardice might be my only virtue. My inability to act prevents me from hurting others, though I doubt that my neglect can even be classified as an entirely conscious mercy. I wonder what unbound kindness feels like. I wonder what it feels like to have fear as a catalyst rather than a shield. In my life, I’ve only ever had one wish. It exists as a little lantern that I lit and let float to Heaven.

    Oh God, please let me be good.”

    Even if that little lantern reached its destination, the journey might have been meaningless. Because, can someone become good, or is it simply fate? I have long since known that I am incapable of change, so if I was not already good (which the act of asking implies), then what is the point of asking? I could ask to change my fate, but my heart only had just enough fire to light one little lantern. The idea of mustering more is far too burdensome. The only thing that I have left is the sword irrevocably tied to my hands.

    The battlefield was silent, no clashing of swords nor rustling of footsteps. Only the labored breathing of the little soldier is discernible. I could blame the weakness of my body on laden limbs and haunted breaths, but what about the weakness of my heart? Thus, in a slow succession of nothingness, hues of midnight blue fall to vibrant rays of gold and pink brushstrokes. The sword is sheathed, and the battlefield is locked back in its crypt. Reprieve is very short, though, only lasting until midnight claws its way back into the sky.

    On some nights, the scene shifts. The image of a little soldier boy in a grassy plain contorts into a sexton in an unkempt graveyard. Headstones extend in lines far beyond what my eyes can see. The names on each stone are indistinguishable; weathered age steals their identities. Only half-bloomed white lilies remain reverently placed on each grave. The sexton’s soiled white robes stand out amongst the gloom, but only just barely. Just like her robes, her hands are covered in a film of grime, and her fingernails are broken and jagged. It’s almost as if she scraped her way out of her own grave. I watch as she walks along a well-traveled path, only stopping to kneel before a mausoleum of hope. It’s covered almost entirely in vines. Its pearly white exterior seemingly beaten into submission by forest green. The vestibule has long since browned with age, now solely ornamented with dead leaves and twigs.

    It seems that despite its ugly visage, the sexton has yet to retire her efforts to maintain the mausoleum. In her genuflection, she uses her hands to sweep the foliage away and grasp at the vines polluting the building. All the while, her eyes stay firmly closed and her head bowed, as if deep in prayer. I can only laugh as each deferential care is undone. The wind resurrects the twigs and leaves with the tempo of a slow waltz. With each vine pulled off, ten more grow to fill its void. Of course, with her eyes closed, the sexton sees none of the desecration of her work.

    How absurdly dutiful this ritual is! The notion of blind perseverance. Even as her arms tremble, she does not stop– for what cause? A brief glimpse of the past’s former glory? The force of my laughter brings me to my knees. As the wind carries the sound farther, it begins to resemble a sob. It’s been many years since my perseverance has been dissected from my soul and replaced with regret. I wonder if I could burn my regret as fuel like the sexton. Could I explode into a flurry of bright light? Could I light one more little lantern? My question is answered by the taste of ash on my tongue. It seems that my regret has long since doused whatever embers I had left.

    As I look back at the sexton’s closed eyes and frantic hands, I’m not sure which scene is worse: the little soldier boy or the sexton. A cacophony of silence versus the despair of darkness. Another remarkable lineup. Sometimes the sexton feels like a champion for the little soldier boy, other times she feels like penance.

    As every night concludes, I am left with the same plea:

    “Oh God, must this really be all that I am?”

    I’m not sure why my bravery strikes only when my spirit is nearly withered. It seems that I can only muster enough courage to stop fatality rather than pain. What an inconvenient defense mechanism. This resolve of mine is the last barrier between the fractures of myself and the call of the night. I wonder which one could bear my cross: a mask, a blindfold, a sword, or a lantern. I wonder which one would buckle my strength. I wonder how much more I can love that little soldier boy and the sexton. I wonder how much more I can resent them. Nonetheless, the sun always rises and falls just as my heart does.

    I’m not sure how many nights I have left until my soul atrophies, nor do I know whether the scalpel in my hand is meant for a surgeon or a mortician. Perhaps I could live and let things be, let fate prevail, but I know that I couldn’t. For my will has always wavered, but never once abandoned me.

    Leave a comment

  • Fleabag: What Defines a Successful Love Story?

    Fleabag, BBC, 2019

    Could you ever trade in the comfort of security for the grief of hope?

    This question sways the branches of Fleabag and the Hot Priest’s relationship in season two. They dance around each other. At times, they lean in, only to hide behind the wall of ‘forbidden’ when it starts to feel more real.

    Love is fickle, but also a choice. Even so, how can you decide between something that feels right and something unyielding?

    For Fleabag, love is fleeting and unequal.

    For the Hot Priest, love means giving up his life’s meaning.

    Love is much more complex than a simple feeling, so analyzing the love portrayed in Fleabag requires more nuance than the standard ‘will they, won’t they’ query. Which brings me back to the titular question of this post: What defines a successful love story? Is it marriage? Is it a grand gesture? Or, is it a quiet rejection at a bus stop? For our beloved heroine, the latter might just be the answer.

    Her grief becomes her
    Fleabag, BBC, 2019

    To understand how Fleabag loves, it is important to first understand her grief. To grieve is to burn. It is isolating and overwhelming.

    Grief is a dark cavern extending far beyond what the eye can see, with walls that grow narrower with each mile. It is the pressing ache on your chest as the oxygen begins to run out, and each breath feels more painful than the last. It is the carefully placed rock in the middle of your path that causes you to trip and graze your knees. It is the despair that traps you on the ground, and the guilt that forces you back to your feet. But, most of all, grief is the blood that trails the procession.

    Love is always different to those who have lost. It loses its novelty. It begins to feel more like a means to an end.

    If the end of season one marks the beginning of Fleabag accepting the need to grieve, season two shows the desire to open herself up again. Season two starts with a dramatic dinner party where Fleabag is completely alienated. Claire, her sister who typically acts as her reprieve, is angry with her. So, she sits in the restaurant, ignored until she is ridiculed. The only person to acknowledge her as something other than a joke is this Hot Priest, whom she has never met before. He addresses her directly and shows an innocent interest in her that she had not felt in a long time.

    WARNING: Embargoed for publication until 00:00:01 on 26/02/2019 – Programme Name: Fleabag – TX: n/a – Episode: n/a (No. 1) – Picture Shows: The Priest (ANDREW SCOTT), Fleabag (PHOEBE WALLER-BRIDGE), Martin (BRETT GELMAN) – (C) Two Brothers – Photographer: Luke Varley

    That brief glimpse of warmth fanned the few embers left of her flame. It showed her that she was still worthy of simple acts of kindness.

    After the dinner, she sought him out and made a connection with him. It is important to understand that, at this time, her only true friend was her sister, with whom she was not on speaking terms. Throughout the show, she never made any moves to form noteworthy bonds with another person, only brief trysts. Fleabag seeking companionship with the Hot Priest is groundbreaking for her.

    All of their meetings hold a heavy romantic tension. Their eyes latch onto each other, and their words form pretty pictures of flirtation. But that is not the only significance of their relationship. The Hot Priest puts in effort to see her, to understand all of her idiosyncrasies. He holds out his hand to her rather than demand to fix her. The perfect example of this is when he asks where she goes when she breaks the fourth wall.

    He pays attention. He cares for her presence rather than her potential.

    Fleabag, BBC, 2019

    Fleabag still carries the feeling of guilt that her love is destructive, so she sequesters herself and hides behind the masks of quirky and/or flirty. The Hot Priest, gazing through the masks, shows her that there is still a person behind them. The time skip between season one and two taught her to develop respect for herself, but the Hot Priest’s gentle regard gives her permission to view herself fondly.

    But if this relationship is positive, why would a show about growth make it so brief?

    To be loved, teaches how to love

    Losing someone chips away at your perception of the world. Everything changes; things that once felt important become utterly irrelevant, and time feels like it slips between the cracks of your fingers. But I think the hardest part of losing someone is learning to love again.

    Fleabag didn’t need a love that was written in the stars. All she needed was a door opened. Deep down, the priest knew that too.

    When watching the show, I kept asking myself: would Fleabag still desire the Hot Priest if she knew, undoubtedly, that she would be his choice? There is a sort of safety net in love that is forbidden. It is like seeing a lion in a zoo. You can approach, but you know that there is an impenetrable fence separating you. Fleabag needed to see the lion and to hear the lion’s roar to know that it’s real, but she’s not quite ready to push past the fence and greet it. Learning to love again comes with very small steps; the first of those is to allow yourself to feel loved. Fleabag is nowhere near ready for romance, but she is ready to connect with her sister. She is ready to let herself love again without the fear of irreparably breaking something.

    I believe that love is alive and unique to every person, but I think that it is silly to measure it only by the longevity of a relationship. There is nothing more beautiful than a love that begets more love. I think that this quote encapsulates this idea.

    “Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage.” – Lao Tzu

    Opening her world to the Hot Priest gave Fleabag the courage to repair her relationship with her sister. It gave her the tools to support Claire in her own journey to loving again. The real love story of season two was always between Fleabag and Claire.

    Fleabag, BBC, 2019
    Final thoughts

    “I love you.”

    “It’ll pass.”

    These quotes will haunt me until the end of time, but they are so hauntingly beautiful. There is something so human about an imperfect love. It gives me hope that a love so profound can exist in such small pockets of time. Well, it makes me feel equal parts hopeful and devastated.

    I saw a lot of discourse online about whether or not this type of love is one to avoid. I’d love to hear your opinions!

    Could you sacrifice the peace of the known for the heartbreak of discovery?

    Leave a comment

    Leave a comment

  • Pride & Prejudice & Sith Lords

    There are a lot of activities that I do to fill the cataclysmic dread that consumes my early twenties: reading, journaling, staring at a wall, etc. But none have come quite close to the joy of spiraling after attending a double feature of Pride & Prejudice and Revenge of the Sith on a Monday morning.

    I am not sure what amazing deed I did in my past life to deserve the karmic fate of two of my favorite movies celebrating their 20th anniversary in theaters in the same week, but I about cried as I put my credit card details into the Fandango app and booked a considerably long visit at the local AMC (roughly 4 hours).

    Although I certainly could have used that 24 dollars (plus another 15 for popcorn and a Coke Zero, obviously), to buy, I don’t know, fresh produce or something, there was something primal in my need to see both on the silver screen again. Thus, I adorned myself with my comfiest clothes and my light blue Crocs and drove to the movie theater where I would spend the last of my disposable income and subsequently find my inner child again.

    At first, I meant to enjoy the movies as two separate entities: my fantasy/war fix and then my romance fix. But, alas, my mind is a prison and incapable of watching anything casually. So, after a long afternoon in the theater, I sat on my couch and I spiraled. On the outside, there aren’t many similarities between the two movies: one discusses the heartbreaking origin of one of the film industry’s most notorious villains, while the other details the story of two people lowering their walls and falling in love. While it is almost laughable to compare the stakes in Pride & Prejudice to Revenge of the Sith, the core conflict of both movies really does boil down to the same two vices.

    (1) Pride

    (2) Prejudice

    You may be asking yourself, dear reader, pride and prejudice are often the downfall of many a character, why is it especially relevant to compare these two virtually unrelated movies? One, because I saw them the same day, and two, because the films are strikingly similar in both the individual’s characterization as well as the different plot devices.

    Now, I welcome you to the chaos that is Pride & Prejudice & Sith Lords.

    Anakin Skywalker, meet your twin, Elizabeth Bennett

    Before any macho man or Anakin apologist tries to maim me for comparing the two, let’s look at the remarkably long list of similarities.

    Headstrong, passionate, loyal, independent, fearless, rebellious

    They aren’t similar in adjectives alone, but also in the way that they move the plot along.

    Pride & Prejudice revolves around the life of an unmarried Elizabeth Bennett as she navigates the nuances of love and affection. She meets Mr. Darcy for the first time at a party and then overhears him say some, albeit negative, remarks about her to his friend Mr. Bingley. Prejudiced by her first encounter with him, Elizabeth goes on to assume every negative rumor and word spoken against him as true.

    A brilliant example of this is Elizabeth’s incense at Mr. Wickham’s excommunication from the Darcy estate. It is reasonable not to really question the word of someone spilling their tragic backstory, because, well, why would they lie (for sex appeal, of course). But the degree to which Elizabeth grew enraged at Mr. Darcy was kind of superfluous. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for righteous anger and basic human empathy, however, she knew both men for literally the same amount of time and bestowed upon one the benefit of the doubt and the other staunch loathing. I am a hater, and I’ll be a hater to my dying day, but even I can admit that there is no merit to starting fights with a man that you barely know in support of another man that you barely know. It is almost as if this one trinket of information gave her permission to outwardly and justifiably hate Mr. Darcy.

    Now onto the Revenge of the Sith side of the coin. Throughout the entirety of the prequels, Anakin Skywalker has a tumultuous relationship with the Jedi Council. I am by no means trying to suggest that Anakin’s frustration towards the council is in any way unwarranted. Truthfully, if I were him, I would have defected from the order in pure spite. But, much like with Elizabeth Bennett, Anakin’s hesitation towards the council does not and will not be applied to Chancellor Palpatine, even though Palpatine is in the same position as the Jedi Council to take advantage of him. Anakin unwaveringly believes in Palpatine until he literally spills his evil guts to Anakin, and even then, Anakin still chooses Palpatine’s side.

    It is as if the distrust of one fuels the trust of the other. Prejudice is dichotomous and illogical. It blinds you from obtaining an objective perspective. Certainly, both Elizabeth and Anakin have sufficient reasons to resent Mr. Darcy and the Jedi Council respectively, but that resentment is no indicator of trust with those who share the same resentment. Every person must be judged impartially and individually. Elizabeth and Anakin’s fall happened simply because they could not comprehend their perception being polarized (I dislike Person A, so they must be evil; Person B reaffirms my dislike, so Person B must be good).

    Both Elizabeth Bennett and Anakin Skywalker rely on their prejudices to make decisions which, in turn, force them to fall on their lightsabers.

    Pride Held in Traditions

    Pride is often associated with an unwillingness to change, and, what is typically the most unwilling to change: old institutions.

    Though Mr. Darcy is not an old institution himself, he is a part of the British Aristocracy, and fairly highly placed at that. His birthright is respect, wealth, and admiration. His perceived social superiority should only be amplified in being in the small county of Hertfordshire. Mr. Darcy should be, relatively, untouchable. To our rebellious heroine, however, strength of estate matters far less than strength of character. Thus, Mr. Darcy is forced to reflect on the perception of his actions and explain his intentions in a way that he might never have done before.

    On the other side, the Jedi Council is less willing to examine their own actions. The Jedi have historically been known to be morally good. They are the peacekeepers. As such, their motives have not really been questioned. However, every person is capable of evil, and no order is beyond corruption. Anakin, with Palpatine’s questionable guidance, begins to consider the Jedi as potentially hostile to the Republic that he has fought so valiantly to save. His reluctance to believe in the Jedi council stems from his lived experience of being ostracized. Essentially, the Jedi Council is begging Anakin to distrust them. The pride of being a Jedi, of being a Jedi so revered that they are put in the council, fogs the necessity to show grace and to feel empathy.

    Where Mr. Darcy and the Jedi Council differ is in their reaction to blatant scrutiny. Mr. Darcy responds to anger with explanation. He loves Elizabeth and is willing to set aside his pride to admit his wrongs. He gently explains his perspective and leaves her to do with that information what she will. The Jedi Council discards Anakin’s hurt. They assume they are indubitably right.

    Final Thoughts

    Really, if only Mr. Darcy were in the Jedi Council, then maybe the tragedies of Star Wars would have been prevented. Mr. Darcy can prevent Anakin’s fall, but could the Jedi Council ever be bewitched body and soul? I don’t think so.

    Now, dear readers, I posit some final questions to you all: At what point was Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth’s happy fate sealed? And, at what point was Anakin’s fate doomed?

    One response to “Pride & Prejudice & Sith Lords”

    1. Ashlynn Renee Riley Avatar
      Ashlynn Renee Riley

      what a beautiful read. Your writing is so fluid and captivating to the point where I found it hard to put my phone down. You have an exceptional gift for insight, please give the readers more!

      Like

    Leave a comment